Ferrari Life Forum banner

1978 308 GTS with 348 TS engine?

45K views 127 replies 18 participants last post by  The Dark Side of Will  
It is a hell of an untertaking, but I have to admit that something like this is my dream 308 project. Pin the engine to the ground and build a GTO setup in a 308's body with a modern set of 18" wheels. I'd of course try and stuff a 550 engine in, or something equally insane, but a V8 certainly makes more sense. The 348 engine in stock form is certainly better than the 308/328 engines, and of course it's a great start for higher comp pistons, etc. or going the other way with forced induction.

Like I said, it's a big project. The frames are very different to accomodate the longitudinal setup. But, that's nothing an angle grinder and a welder can't solve. :)

That all said, Reg has a point that the 3.4L route using a 360 crank is probably the best bang for the buck in the 308 hot rodding world right now. It's great to see some variation though; that's what makes the site so fun.

Just my $.02.
 
Given Will's enthusiasm I bet on 12 months before he tearing around the neighbourhood
If he has the time, I wouldn't doubt it either. Fabbing parts is where all the time gets burned up, so if he sticks to the stock ECUs, wiring harness, etc. he'll save huge amounts of time. It's still a very big project.

Rock and roll, Will! :)
 
From what I've seen on the various Ferrari sites, it seems to be split between chemical stripping, sanding, and soda blasting. You seem to get folks that swear by each one and largely insist anyone using a method besides their preference is doing shoddy work. From my unofficial count, it seems like more folks lean towards chemical stripping though.

On 308s, a lot of people find rust in the lower door panels and in the rockers behind the gas tanks.

They used Dinitrol for the undercoating on most parts of 1980s cars. There are certainly alternatives nowadays.
http://www.ferrarilife.com/forums/p....com/forums/projects-rebuilds-modifications/15799-undercoat-sealer-removal.html

It sounds like you have a good plan. It might be worth reaching out to Paul though (username Newman), as his advice would be the tops.
 
...A 360 engine with 355 transmission would be a fantastic powertrain for a 308...
Funny you should mention that. Mark and I were emailing two weeks ago about the exact same topic. Any of the newer V8s mated to a 355 trans should fit and you'd have 6-speeds for easy highway cruising. Throw on an aftermarket ECU and you'd have (beyond) modern Ferrari performance without the dealership visits for maintenance.

Come to think of it, Mark still owes me an email back! :)
 
I had thought about the Maser V8s, but now you made me think a bit more... Would be a great starting point for an engine to massage. The only thing that jumps out at me is that some of the Maser engines are wet sump which would put a damper on things a little bit if doing an over-the-top project (or require more work to convert). I think the older 4.2L engines were dry sump while the newer 4.7L are wet. I'm not 100% sure though as it might vary between model lines.

The 355 has a listed top speed of 183mph. It his it in 6th gear and I always assumed it was at the 8,500 rpm redline as presumably they geared it to run out of engine around the same time it couldn't push any more air. Without doing any deep math, I figured it would spin around 500-1,000 rpm less at highway speeds than my US QV 308. Not exactly a Corvette, but a step in the right direction. Looks like your 348 box has them both beat though.
 
Will- Are you talking about the F355 6 speed? Those numbers do not match Ferrari's numbers.

1st 3.066
2nd 2.157
3rd 1.608
4th 1.269
5th 1.034
6th 0.861
R 2.800

Final Drive 16/57 (3.562)
I'm home now and broke out the pdf owner's manuals... Here's a fun tidbit, the '95 355 manual lists 6th gear as 37/31 = .837 vs. 36/31 = .861 for '96-'99 (above). All the other gears are the same for the entire series. Maybe another reason, beyond the Motronic 2.7 ECUs, to buy a '95. Or just a typo from Maranello! :)

So, in a perfect world with OEM tires my US QV 308 would be turning 4,043rpm at 80mph. With a '95 355 gearbox swapped into my car and the stock rolling circumference tires I'd be spinning 3,231rpm at 80mph.

Here's the math for anyone else waiting for their wife to come home to make dinner. Drop it into Excel and voila. 79.997mph at 4043rpm. That's my stock US QV.
=((((4043/((24/29)*(30/27)*(65/16))*(((((((225*(50/100))*2)/25.4)+16)*3.14)/12)))*60)/5280))

I made a calculator in Excel, and the '95 355 hits its top speed of 183mph at 6,973rpm (assuming no tire expansion). Cd limited apparently.

One of these days I'm going to stop playing with this stuff and just get a second job so I can buy a 430 Scud and not come home with a burning desire to look through owner's manuals and play in Excel! :)