Ferrari Life Forum banner
1 - 20 of 33 Posts

· Registered
Joined
·
749 Posts
I couldn't even start to imagine how that could be done. :eek:

Firstly the 3.0 V8 sits transversely, so adding an extra 2 cyls length to the engine would surely need some widening of the bodywork?

Secondly the V8s sit on top of & in front of the gearbox, with the gear sump & engine sumps "married" together. How you can convert a longitudinal engine to this configuration without spending your entire inheritance would be sure interesting to know!

Maybe easier with a Boxer 12 complete with transaxle?
 

· Registered
Joined
·
476 Posts
I seem to remember seeing this in Road and Track or something back in the 80s.

But, I can't which engine was used. It was transversely mounted though like the Mura. But, I believe it was a Ferrari engine that was used and V engine not a flat 12.

Hey they got a Ferrari V12 into the Cobra to make the Cobrari. Where there's a will (and buckets of money) there's a way.
 

· Registered
Joined
·
5 Posts
Discussion Starter · #10 ·
mchferrari: where is fchat located? I can't seem to find it. Thx.

The article about this car is in the Nov 1995 issue of R&T. I wonder if this car still exists in the modified form? It used the 365 Daytona motor, with a transverse installation.
 

· Registered
Joined
·
1 Posts
The conversion used a dual cam 365 motor (not the 4 cam Daytona motor) and the stock 308 transaxle, along with a lot of machine work. There were plans sold for a while that explained how to do it. Somewhere around here I have one of those books that reprints a collection of magazine articles, and they had a review of the car. As I recall, more torque than stock, not so rev-happy as stock, a faster car.

AtlantaMan over at FerrariChat has a V12 308, although I think it's apart right now. JRV at Ferrari-Talk has also done the conversion and has some poor pics on his website.

Hope that helps.
 
1 - 20 of 33 Posts
This is an older thread, you may not receive a response, and could be reviving an old thread. Please consider creating a new thread.
Top