End of GM & Ford? - Ferrari Life
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
post #1 of 8 Old 07-07-2005, 05:05 AM Thread Starter
 
dpironi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: At my Apple IIc
Ferrari Life Posts: 38
End of GM & Ford?

It's been in the news for months about the lost jobs, closed plants for both GM & Ford.

Shareholders want the blood of GM CEO Rick Wagoner, with market capitalisation of GM dropping from 66 to just 15 billion.

So is GM and Ford on the way out, or to paraphrase Mark Twain has news of their death been greatly exaggerated? With IBM selling out their PC side to a Chinese company, and another Chinese company bidding for Unocal 76, can US industry recover? :-?

Import




&

Domestic

dpironi is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #2 of 8 Old 07-07-2005, 09:23 AM
Administrator
Elite Member
 
Andrew's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: San Francisco
Ferrari Life Posts: 6,320
Well I don't think there is a future for the U.S. auto industry and guess what they deserve every bit of it. The arrogance in Detroit finally caught up. They can't even give away a Hummer H2.

Toyota is now going after the U.S. automakers last bastion in the industry: pickup trucks. Guess what? Toyota is going to clobber them.

I don't think the selling of IBMs PC division was a big deal. It was a very small part of IBM and not even a money marker. Besides, Lenovo will have a hard time beating Dell which was the cause of IBMs PC division hurting in the first place.

Can the U.S. stay competitive? That is questionable with our current education system and rising cost of higher education.

Just my 2 cents, great topic thought.
Andrew is offline  
post #3 of 8 Old 07-07-2005, 11:05 AM
Administrator
Owner
Elite Member
 
Boxer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: UK & Texas
Ferrari Life Posts: 15,131
Porsche, Ferrari, BMW, Dell, Toyota. etc are successful because they know what they do well, understand what types of companies they are, and focus all their resources behind doing the things they do best even better. Ford and GM have no idea what types of companies they are. They are not focussed nor single minded in there approaches to the marketplace. Ford and GM therefore get their #****# kicked in every segment by a different competitor who does that one thing better. If I ran either, I would be putting together a breakup plan now. Sometimes the parts are worth more than the whole.
Boxer is offline  
 
post #4 of 8 Old 07-08-2005, 06:35 AM Thread Starter
 
dpironi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: At my Apple IIc
Ferrari Life Posts: 38
I don't know why GM put so much publicity effort and money towards the Corvette, and to a lesser extent the GTO, for car shows and model development, showing them off in magazines. :-? Regardless of whether they are good cars or not, they don't sell in great numbers and their image doesn't filter down to the regular cars of the GM family. In this respect Ford have got some commercial return for their new Mustang cos it sells in greater no.s than the Vette & GTO combined, and at least there's some chance of getting people to look at their other models while they are having a look at the retro Mustang. Well, that's the theory at any rate. :wink:
dpironi is offline  
post #5 of 8 Old 07-09-2005, 11:25 PM
Owner
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Orange County, Calif.
Ferrari Life Posts: 1,696
I am a capitalist. If I cannot make steel competively than so be it. I feel the same for anything. Let the public decide the value of the product. If General Motors & the Ford Company cannot make cars which the people want, than so be it. The people deserve the finest at the cheapest price. They will find it. The intelligentsia or the bureaucrats cannot tell the people what to buy at what price.

8)

12 cylinders or walk
Bart is offline  
post #6 of 8 Old 07-10-2005, 01:56 AM Thread Starter
 
dpironi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: At my Apple IIc
Ferrari Life Posts: 38
The Japanese manufacturers made, make mostly fuel efficient front drivers and by concentrating on this type of car, which most people want, were able to redesign their main models completely every 3/4 years. Rather than be like GM with something like the F body and keep it around for 10 years before a major redesign. Capitalism indeed to offer something the peeps want. :wink:

Datsun saves you MPGs! 8)

dpironi is offline  
post #7 of 8 Old 07-10-2005, 02:03 AM
Owner
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Ferrari Life Posts: 1,684
I jus don't understand the US auto industry practice of changing a model every year! No one else except the US automakers do that. It's such a waste of money to change the tooling, press dies etc every year. Why can't they change?
Stradale is offline  
post #8 of 8 Old 07-12-2005, 04:12 AM Thread Starter
 
dpironi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: At my Apple IIc
Ferrari Life Posts: 38
The industry got hung up on the idea of annual model changes back when they wanted buyers to rush back soon because of the latest new thing, like a radio with power antenna or reprofiled tailfin. Planned obsolecence, remember the film Tin Men with the aluminum siding salesmen & their Caddies? I bet GM prays at night for a time machine that will take em back to 1962. :green:
dpironi is offline  
Reply

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Linear Mode



Posting Rules  
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

 
For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome
Copyright 2012 ONE Media, Inc.
FerrariLife is independently run with no affiliation with Ferrari SpA
Ferrari for Sale | Maserati for Sale